Netizens of the nanny state, arise!

The Rudd Government, reluctant to force parents to be responsible for what their children see on the internet, is about to introduce a mandatory net filtering regime at the ISP level. This has civil libertarians aghast – not because of the filter as such, but because the list of banned IP addresses will not be made available to the public.
Under this draconian legislation, sites that have ‘refused classification’ (RC) rating will be blocked at the highest level – the ISP’s are obligated to replace any sites that are on the mystery black list with a ‘censored’ page.(and I presume it will be an offence under the new law to reveal the list). No other country in the OECD at present has a secret list not available to the public, although there are plenty of them in places like China, Iran, North Korea and other totalitarian, socialist, fascist or religiously fundamentalist countries.
The ‘selling point’ that Minister Conroy uses to justify these measures is the perceived disgust at pedophile sites showing pictures of children in sexual poses. But for good measure the government has tossed in other reasons which are more likely to cut across peoples’ right to an open internet – sites that advocate suicide, self-harm and euthanasia, terrorist techniques and methods, sites showing how to do criminal acts such as break and enter, anything relating to drugs, bestiality. The exact definition is also secret, of course. And the chances of sites being banned because of certain words and phrases creates an obvious problem for lawyers, psychiatrists, doctors and others who may need to look frankly at things.
In the poster case, pedophilia, it is interesting to note that child sex offences have actually dropped by half in the last ten years. But despite this, the pedophilia witch hunt is hugely popular with the authorities in their moral mode and the media in their venal mode. Doubtless it has many citizens hurrying their children to shelter at the sight of middle aged men in cars. There are probably ads on TV warning children about it.
Conroy attempts to justify his stance by comparing the internet to ‘all other form of publication, like books, papers and TV’, which are rated according to suitability by the government Censorship Board. But according to the Electronic Frontiers Australia action group, this is not true. The internet is quite a different thing. In the case of a banned book, the publishers are made to withdraw it from sale through their printing and distribution network. A banned film will not be seen – the distributors will have been forced to remove it from the cinemas. And so on.
But the internet has no single responsible publisher and it is it’s own distribution network. This creates two difficult problems for a censorship regime. Firstly, any person who is determined to post RC material and who’s site is blocked can simply set up another site and use email to advise his clients, or use a proxy server, or use P2P techniques (to be completely invisible).
There is a very broad spread of sexual innuendo and depiction in our communities, ranging from gentle TV ads for perfume to hard core porn with violence, intimidation and assault. But at the level R18, explicit sex is allowed and available to any horny teenagers out there. The difficulty apparantly starts when little Johnny who is five accidentally turns on the DVD big sister got out last night. Or he clicks on an URL that unintentionally leads to a sexually explicit site. According to senator Conroy he will, from that day on, be damaged. Like a loss of innocence maybe?
Usually accidents like that are so remote from a childs mindset that there is no real comprehension of the meaning. Psychiatrists may disagree and some people are more at risk than others.
The cultural commoditisation of sex proceeds apace, with little girls dressed like Barbi. It is now money AND love that make the world go round.
A divisive side issue is the ‘oh dear the internet speed’ complaint. Note how this will cleverly be used by the filtering advocates as a blind, viz: “there is no effect and no likelihood of a slowing down at the new promised NBN, as the rates are XYZ faster etc”.
It’s just not knowing what you are missing. I think it will lead to an increase in public attention to sex rather than less. Someone, sooner or later is going to release the list, and who wouldn’t want to have a look at some of the sites, just out of curiosity?

anyway, have a look at http://www.efa.org.au/censorship/mandatory-isp-blocking/#SS_2

Climate of change

“Copenhagen was much worse than just another bad deal, because it illustrated a profound shift in global geopolitics. This is fast becoming China’s century, yet its leadership has displayed that multilateral environmental governance is not only not a priority, but is viewed as a hindrance to the new superpower’s freedom of action. I left Copenhagen more despondent than I have felt in a long time.”
Mark Lynas / guardian.co.uk

There seems to be an unspoken belief in the media that scientific consensus is one theory, and non-scientific ideas are another theory that should get the same air-time.
Actually, a theory can only exist in the (international) framework of scientific verification where it can be tested, but an idea (like god’s six day building program for example) can only be sustained by conjecture and driven by a coterie of ‘believers’. Who are usually in it for the power and prestige anyway.
In the case of the absolutely scientifically proven case of increasing annual temperatures things are a bit different. There are many people in the rich world who either can’t or don’t want to cut down on their emissions, ranging from the selfish to the gullible. More importantly, the lack of good scientific education in the community means that concepts like exponential change and unstable equilibrium are not well understood by the citizens. Why has a threefold increase in atmospheric CO2 since 1800 created warming anyway? (clue: “greenhouse effect”). Why will the rapid thawing of the (100000 year old) Siberian permafrost quite probably hasten climate catastrophe? (clue: “methane” ).
The next problem might be called transgenerational dysfunctionality. As mammals we are hard wired to love our young and prepare them for the future. Right up to the time when they can have young and pass on mum and dad’s DNA. But recorded culture and complex language extend our perception of humanity, and increasingly labels like teenager, grandfather are becoming less important.
For most people thinking about your great grandchildren seems pointless. You might be dead by then anyway. Like the old bloke on the beach at Bondi on the front page of the Australian who reckoned he hadn’t seen much change in sea level over the years and no he didn’t think it would affect his grandchildren. (who are probably in their teens anyway). The ability to visualize the misfortune of future civilizations seems like science fiction to most people. In the abstract because “…I will not be here then, anyway”. But the future comes closer, quicker.

Much ado about Barangaroo

Barangaroo was a Cammeragal from the North Shore. She was among the women who tried to lure white men ashore in November 1788 so the warriors could attack them.

Big iconic developments in Sydney are always the stuff of controversy, and the [multi-billion] dollar ‘Barangaroo’ development on the North-western side of the city is no exception. Paul Keating has been working on the master plan for seven years as chairman of the Bangaroo Design Panel and in his opinion, “This is easily the grandest, most important waterfront development in the world.”

Lucky Lend Lease gets exclusive development rights for $6 billion worth of property and in return the people of NSW get a large harbourside public park. The construction period is 10 years. It is currently under the SHFA but will be established as an authority in its own right.
(None of which is yet final, By the way. However the Heads of Agreement has been drawn up between Lend lease and the government and contracts have been signed.)

Mr Keating’s enthusiasm is not shared by some other architects. Take the ones who did not get the contract – Philip Thalis told Architecture & Design Magazine that his team had been told to stop working on it. (They were the 2006 competition winners.)
“Exasperated Australian architects now have to watch British architect Richard Rogers take over the plan that will determine the future of one Sydney’s most important headland developments.” complained the magazine in its quaintly protectionist way.
British architect Lord Richard Rogers (solo after a long design partnership with Renzo Piano, possibly world #1) plans an aggressive development of towers with entirely green credentials. The Powerhouse Museum recently said on its blog “involvement of international design eminence Richard Rogers suggests that Barangaroo will boast design spectacle rather than daggy but vibrant urbanity.” (referring to Darling Harbour)
Lord Rogers is thinking about a 200 m tower to be placed on a pier that projects into the harbour 150 m (3 olympic pools length). The cry goes up that it is the beginning of the end and will set a precedent for further dastardly reclamation of the harbour and foreshore (which apparently belongs to everyone). It is wrongly claimed to be a significant obstruction across the gap to Darling Island. Owners of expensive apartments to the south of the proposed tower hotel are bemoaning their potential loss of sunlight in the morning. A perceived lack of transparency in making the decision is considered an issue…
Moving across the water to Pyrmont it has to be said there is a strong in-your-face quality about the development and there is strong local opposition to the current design. And residents on Louisa Road Birchgrove are complaining about the tower blocking their existing stunning view of the city, although it is a little hard to feel sympathy with them.
The Sydney Morning Herald has weighed in with an absurdly poor graphic of what looks like a photocopy of a carpenter’s pencil sellotaped onto a printout from Google Earth. The National Trust also appears to have panicked and its wits have flown as a result of reading the SMH, judging by their web page.
Paul Keating in an interview on Stateline said “ … why would the Herald go and use some digital company in Sydney to try and do something when they’ve got this material [that's] available from the Government? I’ll tell you why: because the paper’s coverage of this is intellectually corrupt. Truly, deeply intellectually corrupt. The Sydney Morning Herald’s coverage of this has been disgraceful.”

A closer examination of the Barangaroo Development Authority’s maps and videos shows about half the site landscaped public ‘natural’ foreshore open space, right around to Walsh Bay, but there is very high density development in the Southern end of the site between the Roger’s tower and the top of Darling Harbour. The city’s existing skyline buildings will still appear highest from Balmain.
This is prime real estate. It is seen by supporters and developers as a chance to improve the city and for the people, providing a huge headland park right smack in the middle of it. On the tram line!

There has been some dissent within the Sydney Council. Clover Moore has been supportive but the Greens councillor Chris Harris is dead against it. In this 280210 media release he said “It seems to me that mother nature created a beautiful canvas when she shaped Sydney harbour.”
Fine words but in fact the site is entirely reclaimed land according to the NSW Geological Survey, which says it is composed of man-made fill consisting of “dredged estuarine sand and mud, demolition rubble, industrial and household waste”. Not to mention the AGL Producer Gas Plant that was there for almost a century, with remedial costs unknown at the moment.
Cr Harris goes on to talk about ‘Future Premiers in cahoots with their political mates’ and ‘privatisation of the harbour’. So, lets not go there, but instead reflect if any of this dissent will translate into changes to the proposal? Probably not – depends on many factors – this game has many players and huge financial extents, and is well advanced.

Finally, another ingredient in this dense inner harbour pot-pourri is the cruise ship terminal. According to Independent Councillor John Stamolis, a Leichhardt councillor for the Balmain area, the 2006 Barangaroo design retained the cruise terminal, but the government now plans to move it to White Bay. Cr Stamolis is opposed to this (because of perceived loss of amenity to people on that side of the peninsular) and wants the council to write a letter to the Planning Minister, the Lord Mayor of Sydney, and the CEO of the Barangaroo Development Authority, explaining how the LMC don’t like it. But who will care?

$4.5 Billion for ‘clean energy’

The Rudd Government has revealed plans to invest $4.5 billion to support clean energy, made up of $2.4 billion for new coal technologies, $1.6 billion in solar technologies, and $465 million to establish a new organisation called ‘Renewables Australia’.
The $1.6 billion anted-up for solar represents a ten-fold increase in government funding. This new ‘Solar Flagship Program’ plans to have four new solar plants feeding the national grid, with a total capacity of 1000 MW (equal to one of Australia’s 30 giant coal-fired plants). In a joint media release with Martin Ferguson and Climate Change Minister Wong, Environment Minister Peter Garrett claimed that this ‘ambitious’ target will be three times the size of any solar project currently operating anywhere in the world. But the full capacity will not be on-line until 2017, by which time the world’s solar leaders (USA and Spain notably) are expected to have installed as much as 20 000 MW of solar plant. In fact in the same week that the government announced it’s plans, the Californian giant BrightSource Energy signed contracts to complete 14 plants generating a total of 2600 MW over the next four years while Spain plans to have another 730 MW on line by 2010, according to an article on RenewableEnergyWorld.com.
Mark Diesendorf from the University of NSW told ABC Radio National on May 13: “The kind of resources that are being directed to renewable energy here are the resources that you give if you only want to keep doing one-off demonstration projects. What renewable energy needs now is the incentives to expand the market on an on-going basis to build commercial solar power stations and large scale commercial wind farms.”
Minister Garrett claims “The Government’s commitment to establish the Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute will ensure that Australia continues to be a world leader in the development of low emissions coal technology.” But many people think the government is putting it’s money into unproven technologies rather than into renewables, in a desperate attempt to green-wash Australia’s position as the world’s biggest coal exporter.

Coal exploration off coast

Alarm bells have been ringing in the conservation movement since late last year when East Coast Minerals (ECM) applied for licenses to explore 6000 square kilometres of ocean for coal reserves close to the NSW coast between Wollongong and Newcastle. The company is waiting for federal government approval with a decision expected later this year.
ECM proposes to use the underground coal gasification (UCG) process, an untested “green” technology based on controlled burning of coal in the underground seam. Air is forced down a pipe into the coal bed where it combines with ignited coal to produce syngas which is returned to the surface via a second pipe. Syngas – 12 per cent hydrogen, 30 per cent carbon monoxide and 50 per cent nitrogen – will then be used to create diesel fuel, according to ECM managing director Richard Sealey. He said NSW Government estimates indicate there are about 28 billion tonnes of coal in the exploration zone.
Anti-whaling organisation Sea Shepherd member Vanessa Pearce said work prior to extraction of Syngas creates problems for whales and dolphins because of the use of seismic and sonic exploration techniques. “There have been cases of whale beachings associated with offshore explorations for oil and gas,” she said. “The continental shelf off Australia’s east coast is a major migratory route for humpback whales, the mainstay of the valuable and growing whale watching industry.” Pearce said the drilling rigs would be clearly visible from the coast, and major industrial sites with potential for pollution, traffic and safety issues would have to be built at every point where the pipelines meet the shore. “Most of the adjacent coastal area is either developed or national park so it’s hard to know where the output from the offshore rigs will come ashore,” she said.
The Green’s recent submission to the NSW Department of Primary Industries argues that at a time of peak oil and climate change, NSW should be looking to renewable sources of energy rather than continuing its dependence on coal. And according to website ‘theoildrum.com’, exploration of coal reserves is becoming frantic as available oil diminishes. At the same time, heavily polluting conventional coal-fired electricity plants are becoming unfeasible worldwide as environmental regulations tighten.
The Economist magazine reported that new ‘clean air’ rules in the USA have led to cancellation of dozens of coal-fired plants – in Nevada a $5 billion 1500 MW plant was scrapped and the company is now investing in solar and wind generation. But more than 500 new coal-fired plants are planned to go online in China by 2012.

Proposed Metro stirs up the Inner West

the proposed CBD Metro from the city to Rozelle is creating ongoing controversy in the Leichhardt Council area, with councillors holding widely different views. The two Labor councillors both maintain strong support for the project, while the Greens, the Liberals and the Independent councillors are opposed.
Locals are worried about the the effects on traffic near the station, and about the nuisance and noise that will be generated by the five year construction program. Leichhardt Mayor Jamie Parker (Greens) said “ A Childcare centre, local businesses and the local neighbourhood centre are all under threat by the proposed Metro, and questions about traffic, the lack of parking and whether such a huge expenditure would be better spent in the north west remain.” He noted that the Metro would carry up to thirty thousand passengers per hour but that buses at a Rozelle terminal could only handle three thousand.
But Cr Darcy Byrne (Labor) said “ I strongly support a metro system for Sydney and the CBD Metro is the first step. The CBD Metro will see fast trains going from Rozelle to Town Hall and Central every 2 – 3 minutes, this will be fantastic for the Rozelle, Balmain and Lilyfield communities.” Cr Lyndal Howlison (Labor) also confirmed her support for a Metro system, pointing out that Sydney’s existing heavy rail structure is creaking at the seams. She noted the serious crowding and difficult access in peak hour at Wynyard or Town Hall as examples. “Sydney has outgrown those stations. This situation must be addressed before more people are brought into the CBD on trains.”
Other councillors do not share this enthusiasm. Cr Gordon Weiss (Liberal) is a representative of the ward that includes Balmain. He also is concerned that the position of the station under the intersection of Balmain and Victoria roads will cause traffic problems. Cr Weiss noted that Compulsory Acquisition Orders are expected for the properties on all four corners of the intersection to provide the superstructure for the station. He said “The project cost is blowing out before they even start work. It is the wrong place to be spending this huge sum of money”, and said that it might not even happen “as the government doesn’t have the money for it and it is hard to imagine another private public consortium after the disasters of the Lane Cove Tunnel and the Cross City Tunnel”. Cr John Stamolis (Independent) also in the Balmain ward agreed. “Public transport to the inner-city certainly needs to be improved but this could be best done by innovative and cost-effective solutions such as a light rail extension, improved ferry and bus services. Terminating a metro service at Rozelle is problematic. Residents have expressed concerns to me about all these issues.”

Shooting through to Dulwich Hill by tram

A protest in support of extending the existing Metro Light Rail from Lilyfield to Dulwich Hill met Bob Carr when he launched the Museum of Sydney’s exhibition Shooting Through on a tram.
The EcoTransit Sydney community group made sure placards calling for “Light Rail Now” were always in view of the TV cameras there for the exhibition’s opening. To a chant of “17 million not 4 billion” protesters wove through the crowd with a large polystyrene model of a Metro tram held over their heads, and handed out copies of the EcoTransit Sydney (ETS) newsletter and a flyer outlining how Carr had promised to extend light rail in 2000, but did not follow through.
Leichhardt Mayor Jamie Parker spoke passionately in support of the new line and compared the $4Bn price tag for the mini metro to Rozelle with the $17 m required to extend the existing Metro Light Rail.
“An extension to Dulwich Hill is a must and we need another line to the Quay as advocated by Clover Moore,” Parker said.
The mayor described light rail as a cheap, low-cost and low footprint technology and said the extension would take less than a year to fit out and should be started immediately. “Most of the infrastructure already exists, and all inner-west councils are committed to this in a completely non-partisan way,” he said. “Let’s make sure that trams are not just about the past; they are also about the future.”
ETS spokesman Gavin Gatenby said the Government had failed to tackle this issue.
“We have been campaigning for a year. The tracks are there, the infrastructure is there, and it’s all in good condition. It just needs the government to make a decision. All we get is evasions and excuses. In Europe and America and other places light rail systems are the way of the future, because they work, because they are cheap, and because they are people-friendly.”
The exhibition was opened by Jill Wran, wife of retired premier Neville Wran, and former premier Bob Carr. The museum is run by the Historic Houses Trust and its chairman thanked curators and museum staff for their two years of work putting the show together.
Carr talked about growing up in Matraville catching trams to school, and gave an anecdotal overview of the huge tram network that existed in Sydney until the sixties. He did not discuss new tram lines, and did not respond to the ETS flyer.
“This is a government without guiding intelligence,” said Gatenby as ETS packed up its placards. “The advantages of light rail seem to be obvious to everyone except them.”
Check http://www.ecotransit.org.au/ for details of the light rail proposal, and http://www.hht.net.au/ to find out about the Shooting Through exhibition.

Footage returned to whaling activists

The Australian Federal Police has given back 70 hours of Animal Planet video footage confiscated when the Sea Shepherd’s Steve Irwin docked in Hobart in February.
The police action had been in response to Japan’s complaints to the Australian Government that the Steve Irwin was guilty of piracy on the high seas for blocking the actions of the whaling fleet.
A Sea Shepherd Australia spokesman said the videos had been returned and Animal Planet will be showing Whale Wars II in late May.
“There are no warrants or restraints on the ship or any of the crew,” he said. “No details are available on what the AFP is doing right now, but Captain Paul Watson is prepared to return to Australia to face any charges that may yet be laid. He is currently in North America trying to stop the annual slaughter of fur seals in the Canadian Arctic.”
The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society noted on its website that Japan had resumed whale meat imports: “Norway and Iceland are unlawfully shipping Fin and Minke whale meat to Japan, and Japan is making illegal purchases of this meat. In response to this, other nations are saying nothing or sending mild letters of protest. Enforcement is non-existent. This is the first time since 1988 that whale meat has been traded.”
Japanese officials authorised the import of 5.6 tonnes of Minke whale from Norway, but tests showed the meat contained high levels of mercury. Officials said only cooked whale meat could be sold.
Meanwhile, Environment Minister Peter Garrett told the newly-formed Southern Ocean Non-Lethal Research Partnership (SORP) in Sydney last week it was necessary to develop a scientific approach “that doesn’t involve killing whales”.
SORP includes representatives from the International Whaling Commission, Argentina, Chile, France, Germany, Mexico, New Zealand, South Africa and the United States.
Dr Natalie Kelly from the CSIRO presented the meeting with new data on Minke whale distribution in the Southern Ocean, after the first-ever Australian aerial whale survey in December.
“New equipment installed in our aircraft helps detect whales hidden by the ice, opening the way for a really comprehensive count of Minke whales in Antarctic waters,” she said.
Dr Nick Gales of the Australian Marine Mammal Centre said ship-based surveys in the Southern Ocean had found a decline in Minke whale populations over the past two decades. He said the Japanese whale hunt in the Southern Ocean mainly targeted Minke whales.

Sequestration

The Cold Equations


click here for site

It’s All Right Ma, I’m Only Dyin’

Steve Irwin raid: AFP acts as tool of the Japanese Government

The Australian Federal Police (AFP) raided the Sea Shepherd vessel Steve Irwin, when it docked in Hobart on the 21st February.
The ship was met by a party of AFP officers who boarded the ship with a search warrant. Steve Irwin Captain Paul Watson said that among the material seized was hundreds of hours of video for the Animal Planet series Whale Wars, which he said captured some of the most dramatic whale-killing scenes ever seen.
The AFP warrant authorized the seizing of all edited and raw video footage, all edited and raw audio recordings, all still photographs, producer’s notes, interview transcripts, production meeting minutes, post production meeting minutes as well as the ship’s log books, global positioning system records, automatic radar plotting aid, purchase records, receipts, financial transaction records, voyage information and navigational plotted charts.
Australian Federal Police Commissioner Mick Keelty said the Australian Federal Police received a referral from the Australian Foreign Affairs and Trade Ministry on February 17. Japanese authorities complained to the Australian Embassy in Tokyo as well as through the Japanese Embassy in Canberra. The official complaint stemmed from the director-general of the Japanese fishing agency. He declined to show the AFP search warrant on grounds that the investigation was continuing, but he confirmed allegations were made by the Japanese that the Steve Irwin crew may have endangered safe navigation of theNisshin Maru No 3 by deploying a propeller entanglement system between February 2 and 5. Mr Watson allegedly endangered safe navigation of the same Japanese vessel by forcing a deliberate collision.
Police confiscated the ship’s logbook and video footage The crew had cooperated fully and the material taken from the vessel was now being reviewed, Mr Keelty said.
The Captain of the Steve Irwin, Paul Watson stated “Japan does not wish to see the airing of the second season of Whale Wars and is putting as much diplomatic pressure on Australia as they possibly can to prevent further exposure of their illegal whaling operations in the Southern Ocean.”
“I wish that the Australian government would apply the same “diplomatic” pressure on Japan to end their illegal whaling operations. “The Rudd government was elected on a promise to take the Japanese whaling industry to court for their illegal whaling activities. Now they seem to be more interested in taking Sea Shepherd to court for our efforts to intervene against illegal whaling operations.”
Australian Greens leader Bob Brown has demanded the federal government explain why the AFP undertook the raid. “On the face of it, this is outrageous behaviour by the Australian government to secure favour from the Japanese authorities,” Senator Brown said. “And if it wasn’t, what on earth is the Australian Federal Police up to?. It is an extraordinary raid that defies the imagination.” Senator Brown said he could think of no other explanation for why the ship was raided other than to take footage from the Animal Planet team who were on the boat.
“If this action was taken at the behest of the Japanese authorities it will outrage many Australians. The Australian Federal Police can expect detailed questioning from the Greens at Senate Estimates this coming week.”
The federal attorney-general would need to approve any prosecution arising from a raid on the Steve Irwin in Hobart, a Senate committee has been told. “We haven’t reached the stage of seeking … consent,” Bill Campbell, a senior departmental official told a Senate committee hearing on Monday.
The incident followed violent clashes between the Steve Irwin and Japanese whalers in the Southern Ocean since November. Any prosecution would open an international can of worms, the hearing was told. The whaling vessels were Japanese-flagged while the Steve Irwin was flagged in the Netherlands with an international crew. Mr Watson was a Canadian and the alleged offences occurred in international waters. Australia is a signatory to the international convention on safe navigation at sea. “Each state party to the convention is obliged to take jurisdiction over offences where a possible offender is present in its territory,” according to an Australian Government official.
Watson called off his pursuit of the whalers earlier this month, saying the escalating conflict was becoming too dangerous and could result in death. Japan kills whales using a loophole in a 1986 international moratorium on commercial whaling that allows “lethal research” on the mammals, and makes no secret of the fact that the animals’ meat is then served as food.
“I wish that the Australian government would apply the same “diplomatic” pressure on Japan to end their illegal whaling operations,” he said “The Rudd government was elected on a promise to take the Japanese whaling industry to court for their illegal whaling activities. Now they seem to be more interested in taking Sea Shepherd to court for our efforts to intervene against illegal whaling operations.”
He said the recent Animal Planet series Whale Wars was very embarrassing to the Japanese government and the Japanese whaling industry in 2008. Japan does not wish to see the airing of the second season of Whale Wars and is putting as much diplomatic pressure on Australia as they possibly can to prevent further exposure of their illegal whaling operations in the Southern Ocean. “It does indeed look like the Australia Government has given in to pressure from Japan with regards the embarrassment that the first series of Whale Wars caused.”
Captain Paul Watson said he would welcome a trial if it came to that. “We have to start somewhere so it may as well be by taking me to court. Let us get the evidence on the table and although a trial against Sea Shepherd and myself may not allow the introduction of evidence about Japan’s illegal whaling operations, it at least will give us the forum to present our evidence. Let’s see the Australian government bring the Japanese whale killers to Australia to bear witness against Sea Shepherd and Animal Planet and let’s see them appear as witnesses for the government of Australia that professes to be against whaling.”
“It’s a very one-sided affair,” continued Captain Watson. “The Japanese ships have not been boarded by the Australian Federal Police; they have not had their video and navigational data confiscated. They have not been questioned nor will they be, yet they violently attacked my ship and crew in the Southern Ocean. Does the law only go to bat for those who destroy nature’s creation? Are we about to see the ultimate kangaroo court where Sea Shepherd will be legally crucified because the Australian government has not lived up to their promise of taking the whale killers to court? The truth is that we would not have to be in the Southern Ocean defending the whales if the governments of the world would simply enforce the international conservation treaties they once so proudly signed into law. Without enforcement there is no law – just ecological anarchy.”
Captain Watson said he had no complaints about the Australian Federal Police – “They were very professional and polite and they were doing their job in carrying out the orders of the government.”
At least the people of Tasmania are behind Sea Shepherd even if the Australian Government are toeing the Japanese line. If it’s a choice between the support of the government and the support of the people, Watson is happy that Sea Shepherd is enjoying the support of the people.
“From the Australian government we are getting criticism and police raids,” said Captain Watson. “But from the Australian people we are getting a wonderful welcome.”
Some 2,000 people visited and toured the Sea Shepherd ship Steve Irwin on Saturday, February 21st at MacQuarie Dock in Hobart. “It’s good to be home and it’s gratifying to see and hear what people are saying to us and how they appreciate what we are doing,” said crew member Andrew Perry of Hobart.
Andrew was married by Captain Watson to Molly Kendall of Adelaide, South Australia during the Antarctic campaign. The Green Party of Australia sent a gift basket to the happy couple. Hobart bars were offering free drinks to Sea Shepherd crew and members of the public have delivered contributions of supplies and money to the Steve Irwin.
“There is no doubt that Australia is the greatest whale loving nation on Earth,” said Swedish 1st Officer Peter Hammarstedt. “This country rocks.”
The Steve Irwin will remain in Hobart for a month before moving to Melbourne. This week Captain Paul Watson will be speaking at the University of Tasmania, attending a photo exhibit about Tasmanian forests by Green Party leader Senator Bob Brown and will speak to forest activists on the front lines of the battle to save Tasmania’s old growth trees.
“These two issues, whales and trees are closely related more than people know,” said Captain Watson. “Twenty percent of Japan’s paper supply originates in Tasmania. It’s a trade-off. Australia wants to continue destroying old growth forests in Tasmania to sell to the Japanese therefore the government is willing to do the bidding of the Australian whaling industry. In return the Japanese want to kill endangered whales and are threatening trade retaliation against Australia. It seems to me that Japan needs Australia more than Australia needs Japan, but politicians tend to be afraid of anything that upsets the economic apple cart so the whales are being sacrificed so that the destruction of the forests can continue.”
When the Japanese see Australia’s Environment Minister Peter Garrett supporting the destruction of the forests, endorsing uranium mines, dredging Port Phillips bay and killing dolphins, slaughtering kangaroos and allowing shark finning, they can smile and say, ‘he’s one of us’.
“If Peter Garrett is willing to crucify me to appease the Japanese whaling industry then so be it,” said Captain Watson. “I’d rather be tossed into a cell for life than to betray my love for the diversity of life on this wonderful planet.”
Sea Shepherd Captain Paul Watson stated in November 2008 in reply to Garrett’s allegations of extremism:
“There is nothing more insincere than a politician just before an election. They will fire promises from the hip with a veneer of passion and resolve that is peeled quickly away after the votes are counted. Australian Environmental Minister Peter Garrett is a case in point. When Mr. Garrett was an activist musician with Midnight Oil he was a man to be proud of, a person to be deeply admired for his dedication to the cause of conservation. I once stood with him on the logging roads of the Clayquot Valley on Canada’s Vancouver Island to oppose clear-cutting. Midnight Oil performed a concert in 1993 in the middle of a logging road. Damn but we loved them and we loved Peter Garrett. He was the man!
In November 2007, I advised all of my Australian supporters and friends to vote for Labor because according to Mr. Garrett, a Rudd government would actually do something to protect whales from illegal Japanese whaling activities in the Southern Oceans Whale Sanctuary. Now so many them feel betrayed by Mr. Garrett after a year of anti-environmental stands ranging from being pro-dredging of Port Phillip Bay, to supporting logging and new pulp mills in Tasmania, to condemning kangaroos, to appeasing the Japanese whalers. How was I to know in November 2007 that Peter Garrett had been turned to the service of the darkside? He seemed like the knight-errant of modern Australian politics, a man of integrity and courage ready to fight for justice and the planet.
What we have now is the same old, same old. Just another reined in, subservient pawn in a political machine, who does what he is told and seeks to flatter and favour his political handlers instead of the people who elected him.”
The following statement was issued by Peter Garrett when he was Shadow Minister for Climate Change, Environment and Heritage on September 18 2007:
The Australian Government must stand up and stop Japanese whaling
A Rudd Labor Government would not stand in the way of Humane Society International’s (HSI) legal challenge in the Federal Court to request an injunction to stop the Japanese from killing whales within the Australian Whale Sanctuary.
Labor has a clear policy position that we will enforce Australian law banning the slaughter of whales in the Australian Whale Sanctuary. Therefore, Labor would enforce any injunction the courts decides to grant against Japanese whalers. I wish to send a powerful and clear message to the Australian public that Labor believes in enforcing Australian law. This is the right and obvious thing to do. The Howard Government has made a mockery of our laws by refusing to enforce the Whale Sanctuary protections, and it’s just not good enough, frankly. There is an ocean of clear water between the Howard Government and Labor on the issue of whaling. Labor has the guts to stand up to the Japanese whalers – the Howard Government will do no such thing. Mr Turnbull is all talk and no action. All pretty pictures of whales in his election material and no results. We expect the Government will not show support for this hearing. You wouldn’t see such timidity from a Labor Government.
If elected, Rudd Labor will not stand in the way of enforcing Australian law banning the slaughter of whales in the Australian Whale Sanctuary.

Captain Watson noted: “It’s now hard to believe that this man Peter Garrett made this statement. When Senator Ian Campbell was Environment Minister he did much more than Mr. Garrett and he actually gave assistance to us in our efforts to protect the whales. All that has changed as the Rudd government and Peter Garrett use passive-aggressive tactics to hurt the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society financially and to force us to not utilise Australia as a base. This week Australia and Japan announced that they would be seeking a “diplomatic solution.” Translated this means more talk and little or no action.
It is very interesting to hear that Australia is referring to Sea Shepherd actions as illegal when there is no specification as to just what illegal action Sea Shepherd is allegedly doing. The situation is clear. Japanese whalers are targeting endangered whales in an established whale sanctuary in violation of a global commercial whaling moratorium and in contempt of an Australian Federal Court ruling prohibiting Japanese whaling in the Australian Antarctic Economic Exclusion zone. The Rudd Garrett government not only has failed to stand up for the whales, they have now decided to weaken and harass the only group in the world that is actually saving the lives of whales in the Southern Ocean.
A Japanese foreign ministry official confirmed that both countries were employing diplomacy in the row. He also affirmed that Foreign Minister Smith had sought to distance the Australian government from militant environmentalists who have vowed to stop the Japanese hunt by force. Smith “stressed that the Australian government is making a clear distinction from the illegal action taken by anti-whaling groups,” the official said.
Captain Watson continued “Recently a spokesman for Mr. Garrett told the media that Sea Shepherd was a group of extremists. But the question must be asked. What is extreme about upholding international conservation law against illegal whaling activities? What is extreme about doing so without causing physical injuries to the whalers? What is extreme about doing the job that the government of Australia should be doing but clearly does not wish to do? It is frustrating beyond measure to struggle to raise the funds to voyage to the Southern Ocean while Greenpeace collects tens of millions of dollars to supposedly do the same thing and then announces two weeks before the Japanese fleet is scheduled to depart that they will not be doing what they were collecting the money to do. It is frustrating to have supported a politician based on promises he has refused to deliver and to suffer the insult upon injury of having this same politician repay our support of him with hostility and harassment. At least Mr Garrett has had a lesson in real politic this last year. He has discovered that talk really is cheap and that his real masters are in Tokyo. He has discovered that the midnight oil he is now burning is whale oil and the lives of the whales are secondary to the business of business.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.